AERO’s Classroom Management Guide for 2024: A Strong Start – But Here’s Why the Safe House Framework Is the Missing Piece for Some Students
For educators navigating the complex waters of classroom behaviour, the Foundational Classroom Management Resources Handbook by AERO (2024) offers a well-structured, evidence-informed approach. It’s calm, respectful, and designed to equip teachers with the tools to create positive, productive learning environments.
But when it comes to autistic and ADHD students – those who often sit at the margins of traditional behaviour systems – the AERO guide, while strong, doesn’t quite cover all the bases.
That’s where the Safe House Framework’s Behaviour Response Blueprint comes in – not to replace AERO, but to complete it.
AERO’s Strengths: Clear, Practical, and Calm
Let’s start with what AERO gets right – and there’s plenty to celebrate.
✅ Relationships First
AERO‘ classroom management guide places a strong emphasis on building positive teacher-student relationships – not just with the “easy kids”, but with every student. It encourages warmth, greeting students at the door, checking in, and avoiding sarcasm or yelling. This approach closely mirrors the Behaviour Response Blueprint’s emphasis on relational safety – the idea that a child must feel secure in order to learn or behave well.
For autistic students, who may already feel misunderstood or anxious, a consistently kind teacher can make all the difference.
✅ High Expectations (Done Right)
AERO rightly insists that we presume competence – even when a student has learning differences. This lines up well with the Behaviour Response Blueprint’s core philosophy of “different, not less”. It’s not about lowering the bar but about supporting different ways of reaching it.
That said, AERO risks trouble when “high expectations” are interpreted too rigidly – for example, expecting all students to make eye contact or sit still. The Behaviour Response Blueprint adds that we must adapt the form, not just the standard.
✅ Explicit Routines and Predictability
From entrance routines to transitions to end-of-day wrap-ups, AERO‘s classroom management guide strongly advocates for clear routines that reduce confusion and anxiety. This is a win for many autistic students who thrive on predictability.
But routines must be flexible, and here’s where AERO falls a little short. The Behaviour Response Blueprint’s Safe House metaphor – especially the Floor Plan stage – reminds us that every student is different. For instance, some students need to stim, others need movement breaks, and rigid routines can unintentionally exclude them.
Where AERO Falls Short for Autistic Students
Despite all its strengths, AERO doesn’t explicitly address autistic experiences or rights. And that silence can be costly.
🚫 No Real Mention of Neurodiversity or Disability Rights
The handbook makes only a passing reference to neurodivergence (in relation to how students may demonstrate “active listening”), but it does not mention autism, trauma, disability legislation, or human rights obligations.
There is no guidance on supporting students who may need sensory breaks, communication supports, or individualised adjustments. For students whose behaviours are shaped by neurological differences – rather than simply “choices” – this silence is a serious gap.
Contrast that with the Behaviour Response Blueprint, which centres psychological safety and reasonable adjustments as rights, not favours.
AERO assumes that with enough structure and support, students can behave.
The Behaviour Response Blueprint asks: “But what if the expectation itself needs adjusting?”
🚫 One Size Still Doesn’t Fit All
AERO offers a clean “flowchart” of behaviour responses: monitor, give a cue, offer a choice, then apply a consequence. Logical and clear? Absolutely. But it still assumes that behaviour is something to be managed – not understood.
The Behaviour Response Blueprint flips that script. It asks:
- What’s the unmet need here?
- Is this behaviour a communication of distress?
- Do we need to support first – not correct?
This reframing is essential when working with autistic students, especially during meltdowns or shutdowns where “compliance” is not the right goal.
Why the Safe House Framework Is the Necessary Adjunct
So how does the Safe House Framework’s Behaviour Response Blueprint plug the gaps in the AERO classroom management guide’s approach?
Let’s break it down using its six-part metaphor:
1. Foundation – Mindset of Respect
AERO promotes high expectations and calm correction, but doesn’t challenge the pathology paradigm – the assumption that ND kids are broken or defiant.
Safe House builds a foundation of radical respect: different neurotypes are valid, not faulty. Teachers are asked to question their own biases: “Am I seeing this child as a problem… or as a person under stress?”
2. Floor Plan – Understanding Individual Needs
AERO’s classroom management guide says “know your students.” That’s good. But the Behaviour Response Blueprint goes further: accommodate their differences.
For example:
- An autistic student might need a visual schedule or to skip noisy transitions.
- A student with ADHD might need a movement break during silent reading – not a consequence for being out of seat.
AERO assumes structure helps everyone. The Behaviour Response Blueprint says: structure must flex for the individual.
3. Walls – The Support Team
AERO encourages consistency and collaboration – to a point. It suggests teachers talk to families but doesn’t detail multi-agency collaboration or the importance of including therapists, aides, or student voice.
The Behaviour Response Blueprint’s “walls” are built by the whole team – parents, specialists, and yes, even the student themselves. That’s crucial for autistic learners who often need support across contexts.
4. Windows – View Behaviour Through a Nervous System Lens
AERO tells us to consider “why” a behaviour is happening. But it doesn’t push hard enough.
The Behaviour Response Blueprint reminds us: all behaviour is communication.
- Is the student overwhelmed?
- Do they feel unsafe?
- Are they struggling with a lagging skill?
This perspective shifts our goal from control to compassionate interpretation. It’s not “how do I get this kid to behave,” but “what is this behaviour telling me?”
5. Door – Prioritise Relationship and Trust
Here’s where AERO’s classroom management guide shines again – its focus on respectful tone, private correction, and consistent care opens the “door” to connection.
The Behaviour Response Blueprint deepens this: relational safety means the student feels free to be their authentic self – not forced to mask, mimic or suppress who they are.
6. Roof – Rights and Structural Safety Nets
This is AERO’s biggest blind spot.
It doesn’t mention:
- Disability legislation, such as the Disability Discrimination Act
- Protective policies, such as the Disabilities Standards for Education
- Requirement for reasonable adjustments
The Behaviour Response Blueprint places these at the top of the house: you cannot build inclusion without legal and ethical protections. For example, denying a student their movement break isn’t just poor practice – it might breach their rights.
Real-World Implications for Educators
Let’s bring it home with an example.
Scenario: An autistic student is disruptive during quiet teaching time.
AERO Approach:
- Non-verbal cue (a look or gesture)
- Private verbal prompt
- Offer a choice: stop now, get help, or catch up later
- Logical consequence if behaviour continues
BRB-Informed Approach:
- Same initial calm cue
- But instead of consequence, the teacher reflects:
- Why might the student be dysregulated?
- Do I know what their support needs are?
- Are their support needs being met consistently?
- What unmet need might be at play here?
- Then supports regulation: maybe a break, movement, or redirection
- Later, collaborates with the student: “What helps you when you feel like that?”
Same tools. Different mindset. Different impact.
Final Thoughts: Use AERO – But Use It with the Behaviour Response Blueprint’s Insight
AERO’s classroom management guide gives you the toolkit. The Safe House Framework® gives you the blueprint for responding.
Educators don’t need to choose between them – they need to integrate them.
Use AERO to:
- Structure your classroom
- Teach routines
- Respond calmly and consistently
Use BRB to:
- Understand why behaviour happens
- Personalise supports
- Honour each student’s rights, identity, and dignity
When used together, these frameworks help teachers create classrooms that are not only calm and clear – but also compassionate and inclusive.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Can I use AERO strategies with autistic students?
Absolutely – but you’ll need to adapt them with insight. Be flexible with expectations and always ask what adjustments are needed.
Q: Isn’t structure good for autistic students?
Yes – but only when it’s the right structure for that individual. Predictability is great. Rigidity isn’t.
Q: Is the Behaviour Response Blueprint anti-discipline?
No – it’s anti-punishment and pro-support. It aims to understand and address behaviour, not just manage it.
Q: How do I start integrating BRB into my AERO practice?
Join the FREE 90 minute on-demand training for educators and school teams – you’ll find everything you need inside.
Recommended Reading:
Unfair Punishments: EdTrust Report
Comments are closed